“"The practice exams closely matched the certification objectives and helped me strengthen my firewall configuration skills."”
Joseph Bell
Network Security Engineer
The NGFW-Engineer exam replaced the old PCNSA and PCFSE paths when Palo Alto Networks retired both certifications on January 31, 2025, along with the entry-level PCCET. If you were on a PCNSA track, or even coming from the now-retired PCNSE (gone as of July 31, 2025), you’re effectively starting a new blueprint — there’s no bridge exam that carries old credit forward.
This is a Specialist-level exam, delivered through Pearson VUE, and it’s built around multiple-choice questions rather than hands-on lab tasks. That said, “multiple-choice” undersells how the questions actually feel. Many are scenario-driven: you’re given a configuration state or a network symptom and asked what to do next, not asked to define a term. Candidates consistently report that question difficulty is uneven across the 90-minute window — a run of straightforward networking questions followed by a cluster that requires you to reason through a multi-step Panorama or automation workflow in your head.
Palo Alto Networks doesn’t publish every exam-day detail (an exact, guaranteed question count isn’t officially confirmed), but the consistent figure reported by candidates and training providers is around 75 questions, scored on a 300–1000 scale with a passing score of 860. Budget your time accordingly — with roughly a minute per question, the scenario items will eat more of your clock than the recall ones, so don’t let yourself get stuck.
The blueprint has three domains, and two of them carry equal, dominant weight — this isn’t an exam where you can coast through networking and lean on device settings, or vice versa.
Domain | Weight | Focus |
|---|---|---|
PAN-OS Networking Configuration | 40% | Routing, interfaces, zones, VPN and site-to-site/remote access connectivity, NAT |
PAN-OS Device Setting Configuration | 40% | Objects, security and NAT policy creation, profiles, certificate management, HA |
Integration and Automation | 20% | Deployment across PA-Series, VM-Series, CN-Series, Cloud NGFW, and AI Runtime Security; API-driven automation; Panorama, templates, and device groups; third-party integration (Kubernetes, hypervisors, CSPs, Terraform, Ansible); ACC dashboards and custom reports |
That 20% automation domain is small on paper but outsized in how often it trips people up, which brings us to the next section.
Scripting and API fluency. The official exam datasheet lists basic familiarity with scripting languages like Python and PowerShell as an expected skill — not a nice-to-have. If your NGFW background is entirely click-through-the-GUI, the API-driven automation questions in Domain 3 will feel like a different exam entirely. You don’t need to write production scripts, but you need to recognize what an API call is doing and why someone would automate a given deployment step.
Third-party deployment integration. Kubernetes, hypervisor platforms, cloud service providers, Terraform, and Ansible all show up explicitly in the blueprint under Integration and Automation. Candidates who’ve only ever deployed a physical PA-Series appliance in a data center tend to skip this entirely in their prep, then get blindsided by questions on CN-Series container deployment or infrastructure-as-code workflows.
ACC dashboards and custom reporting. It’s an easy section to assume is “just reporting” and therefore low-value to study. It isn’t low-value on the exam — it’s a named line item in the blueprint, and questions here test whether you actually know how to build and interpret Application Command Center views, not just that the feature exists.
The in-person-only delivery format. This isn’t a content gap, but it catches people off guard: Palo Alto Networks has moved away from offering a remote-proctoring option for this exam, so you need to schedule and travel to a Pearson VUE test center. Factor that logistics lead time into your prep timeline, especially if your nearest test center has limited slots.
Because so many questions are scenario-based rather than definitional, drilling flashcard-style recall questions will only get you partway there. When you work through practice questions here, don’t just check whether you picked the right letter — read the explanation and ask whether you understood why the other three options were wrong. On a configuration-state question, two of the four choices are often technically plausible but wrong for the specific scenario described, and that’s exactly the trap the actual exam sets.
Split your practice time roughly in proportion to the blueprint: don’t spend 80% of your practice sessions on networking just because it’s familiar and only 20% on the automation domain just because it’s unfamiliar. The weighting (40/40/20) is also a decent proxy for where you’ll lose points if you ignore a domain, but the automation section is where under-preparation shows up disproportionately, since it’s the domain most candidates study least.
Treat timed practice runs as a pacing test, not just a knowledge test. If you consistently finish a 75-question practice set in under 60 minutes but get the scenario questions wrong, your problem isn’t speed — it’s that you’re reading configuration scenarios too quickly and missing a constraint in the question stem.
Studying only the GUI workflow and skipping automation entirely. This single gap accounts for a large share of near-misses, since Integration and Automation is a guaranteed fifth of the score.
Relying on outdated PCNSA/PCNSE-era material. The blueprint and product coverage have shifted enough (CN-Series, Cloud NGFW, AI Runtime Security, Terraform/Ansible integration) that older prep content leaves gaps.
Underestimating the HA and certificate management portions of Device Setting Configuration. These get less attention in most self-study plans than security policy creation, but they’re tested with the same weight.
Not practicing under time pressure. Scenario questions take longer to parse than definitional ones, and candidates who’ve only drilled quick-recall questions run out of time on the back half of the exam.
If you’re new to Palo Alto NGFW products: Palo Alto Networks recommends two to three years in an IT security role, with at least two years specifically on NGFW solutions, before attempting this exam — it is not designed as an entry point. If you’re short of that experience, plan on several months of hands-on lab time before you’re ready for a serious attempt, not just reading.
If you have hands-on PAN-OS experience (e.g., former PCNSA holders or working administrators): Your networking and policy fundamentals likely transfer well. Concentrate your remaining prep time on the Integration and Automation domain and on anything released since your last hands-on project — CN-Series, Cloud NGFW, and AI Runtime Security deployment specifics are newer additions that older experience won’t automatically cover.
If you’re retaking the exam: Go back to your score breakdown if you have it, and be honest about whether you under-studied automation. Retakers who fail a second time most often repeat the same gap rather than discovering a new one — don’t just redo generic review, target the domain that actually cost you points.
This is a young certification — it launched in late January 2025 as part of Palo Alto Networks’ broader move to role-based certifications, replacing PCNSA, PCSFE, and PCCET. Because it’s tied to an actively developed product line, expect the Integration and Automation domain in particular to keep absorbing new deployment targets as Palo Alto Networks ships new form factors; AI Runtime Security is a recent addition to the blueprint’s deployment list, and that pattern is likely to continue. Routing engine updates and newer VPN/cryptographic topics have also been called out as areas where older study content falls behind, since they reflect relatively recent PAN-OS changes Preparing for another exam? Try our free Splunk Core Certified Power User practice test.
Last updated on Oct, 29 2026