“"The practice exams accurately reflected the Level 4 difficulty and helped me improve my reading speed and comprehension."”
Emily Park
Graduate Student
If you searched for a standalone “Korean Proficiency Test Level 4,” it’s worth clearing this up first: you don’t register for a Level 4 exam specifically. You register for TOPIK II, which covers levels 3 through 6 in a single sitting, and your combined score across listening, reading, and writing places you at whichever level you earned — there’s no way to “aim” the registration itself at Level 4. This page is built for people whose actual target is landing in the Level 4 band, which typically means a total score between 150 and 189 out of 300 on the paper-based test korean proficiency test level 5 practice exam
That distinction matters for how you prepare: you’re not studying a narrower Level 4 syllabus, you’re studying the full TOPIK II content and trying to clear a specific score threshold within it.
TOPIK II runs about three hours, split into two sessions with a short break between them. The paper-based format breaks down like this:
Section | Questions | Time | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Listening | 50 | 60 min | 100 |
Writing | 4 | 50 min | 100 |
Reading | 50 | 70 min | 100 |
Total | 104 | 180 min | 300 |
An internet-based version (IBT) exists too, with the same content delivered on computer — the writing section is typed instead of handwritten, and the scoring scale is different (out of 600 rather than 300), so don’t mix up study benchmarks between the two formats if you’re prepping from material written for the other one.
A quirk that surprises people: there’s no minimum you need to clear in each individual section. You could do poorly on writing and strongly on listening and reading, and if your total lands at 150+, you’re a Level 4. That changes how you should allocate study time if one skill is dragging you down.
Level | PBT Score Range | Approximate CEFR |
|---|---|---|
Level 3 | 120–149 | B1 |
Level 4 | 150–189 | B2 |
Level 5 | 190–229 | C1 |
Level 6 | 230–300 | C2 |
Level 4 is a meaningful line in the sand — it’s commonly the minimum requirement for graduating from a Korean-taught bachelor’s program and for several visa and employment pathways, which is a big part of why so many candidates target it specifically rather than just “doing their best” on TOPIK II.
The writing section’s essay prompt. TOPIK II writing isn’t just fill-in-the-blank; the final question is a structured essay (usually 600–700 characters) on an abstract or argumentative topic. Candidates who’ve built strong reading and listening skills through immersion often haven’t practiced producing that kind of structured Korean output under time pressure, and it shows in the score.
The jump in listening pace and topic abstraction from Level 3 territory to Level 4. Lower TOPIK II passages are mostly everyday-life scenarios. By the material that separates a 149 from a 150, you’re parsing debates, lectures, and news-style audio at natural speed — candidates who studied primarily with slowed-down learner audio get caught off guard.
Reading passages that test inference, not just vocabulary. Knowing the words in a passage doesn’t guarantee you can answer the question, because a lot of Level 4-range reading questions ask what the author implies or what tone a passage takes, which is a different skill than vocabulary recall.
Because your actual goal is a total score threshold, not passing individual sections, practice with full timed sets and track your three section scores separately rather than just your overall pass/fail. If you’re consistently strong in reading but weak in writing, more vocabulary drilling won’t move your total — targeted essay practice will.
For the writing section specifically, don’t just read model essays; write full responses under the 50-minute time limit and compare structure, not just vocabulary choice, against strong examples. Essay-type sections reward organization as much as grammar accuracy.
Studying almost entirely with reading material and treating listening and writing as secondary — since there’s no per-section minimum, this can backfire badly if listening or writing drags your total below 150.
Practicing exclusively with slowed or simplified listening audio, then being unprepared for natural-speed native audio on test day.
Underestimating the essay’s time pressure — candidates who’ve never written a full response in 50 minutes often run out of time mid-argument.
Confusing PBT and IBT score scales when reviewing practice results, which leads to a false sense of where you actually stand.
Beginner starting from scratch aiming for Level 4: Test-prep estimates commonly cite roughly 800–1,200 study hours to reach Level 4 from zero — these aren’t official NIIED figures, just a rough benchmark from experienced instructors, and your mileage will vary heavily based on study intensity and any existing exposure to the language.
Already at a solid intermediate level (comfortable with everyday conversation, some reading): Several months of focused practice on the specific TOPIK II format — especially timed essay writing and natural-speed listening — is usually enough to close the gap, since the core language ability may already be close to the Level 4 threshold.
Retaking after narrowly missing 150: Pull apart your score by section if you have that detail available, and target the weakest one specifically rather than reviewing everything evenly. A candidate who scored 40/100 on writing and 70+ on the other two sections has a very different plan than one who scored evenly low across all three.
Last updated on Oct, 26 2026